Business Innovation and market outcome:
Market outcome from innovation can be studied from different lenses. The industrial organizational approach of market characterization according to
the degree of competitive pressure and the consequent modelling of firm behavior often using sophisticated game theoretic tools, while permitting
mathematical modelling, has shifted the ground away from an intuitive understanding of markets. The earlier visual framework in economics, of
market demand and supply along price and quantity dimensions, has given way to powerful mathematical models which though intellectually satisfying
has led policy makers and managers groping for more intuitive and less theoretical analyses to which they can relate to at a practical level.
Non quantifiable variables find little place in these models, and when they do, mathematical gymnastics (such as the use of different demand
elasticities for differentiated products) embrace many of these qualitative variables, but in an intuitively unsatisfactory way.
In the management (strategy) literature on the other hand, there is a vast array of relatively simple and intuitive models for both managers
and consultants to choose from. Most of these models provide insights to the manager which help in crafting a strategic plan consistent with
the desired aims. Indeed most strategy models are generally simple, wherein lie their virtue. In the process however, these models often fail
to offer insights into situations beyond that for which they are designed, often due to the adoption of frameworks seldom analytical, seldom
rigorous. The situational analyses of these models often tend to be descriptive and seldom robust and rarely present behavioral relationship
between variables under study.
From an academic point of view, there is often a divorce between industrial organisation theory and strategic management models. While many
economists view management models as being too simplistic, strategic management consultants perceive academic economists as being too theoretical,
and the analytical tools that they devise as too complex for managers to understand.
Innovation literature while rich in typologies and descriptions of innovation dynamics is mostly technology focused. Most research on
innovation has been devoted to the process (technological) of innovation, or has otherwise taken a how to (innovate) approach. The
integrated innovation model of Soumodip Sarkar goes some way to providing the academic, the manager and the consultant an intuitive
understanding of the innovation – market linkages in a simple yet rigorous framework in his book , Innovation, Market Archetypes and
Outcome- An Integrated Framework.
The integrated model presents a new framework for understanding firm and market dynamics, as it relates to innovation. The model is
enriched by the different strands of literature – industrial organization, management and innovation. The integrated approach that
allows the academic, the management consultant and the manager alike to understand where a product (or a single product firm) is
located in an integrated innovation space, why it is so located and which then provides valuable clues as to what to do while designing
strategy. The integration of the important determinant variables in one visual framework with a robust and an internally consistent
theoretical basis is an important step towards devising comprehensive firm strategy. The integrated framework provides vital clues
towards framing a what to guide for managers and consultants. Furthermore, the model permits metrics and consequently diagnostics of
both the firm and the sector and this set of assessment tools provide a valuable guide for devising strategy.
References
- Wikipedia.org